Sources (2) – Details for Reviewers

Fine, E., Handelsman, J., Reviewing Applicants: Research on Bias and Assumptions (2006)

Gvozdanović, J., K. Maes., Implicit Bias in Academia: A Challenge to the Meritocratic Principle and to Women’s Careers – And What to Do About It. ADVICE PAPER no.23. League of European Research Universities (2018)

Kaatz, A., Guerrez, B., Carnes, M., Threats to Objectivity in Peer Review: The Case of Gender. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 35(8): 371–373 (2014)

Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., Handelsman, J., Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (41): 16474–9 (2012)

Paludi, M. A. & Bauer, W. D., Goldberg Revisited: What’s in an Author’s Name, Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 9 pp. 387–390 (1983)

Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., Ritzke, D., “The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study.” Sex Roles 41(7–8): 509–528 (1999)

Van Veelen, R. & Belle, D., Academics as Superheroes: Female Academics’ Lack of Fit with the Agentic Stereotype of Success Limits Their Career Advancement (2020)

Wennerås, C. & Wold, A., Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature 387, 341–343 (1997)