• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • scilog Magazine
    • Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF START Awards
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • Elise Richter
        • Elise Richter PEEK
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • ERA-NET TRANSCAN
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol–South Tyrol–Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
        • Accounting for Approved Funds
        • Labor and Social Law
        • Project Management
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
        • Accounting for Approved Funds
        • Labor and Social Law
        • Project Management
      • Expiring Programs
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open Access Policy
          • Open Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Twitter, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

Statistical Model Building Strategies for Cardiology

Statistical Model Building Strategies for Cardiology

Daniela Dunkler (ORCID: 0000-0003-1339-0311)
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/I4739
  • Funding program Principal Investigator Projects International
  • Status ended
  • Start September 1, 2020
  • End August 31, 2024
  • Funding amount € 138,554
  • Project website
  • E-mail

DACH: Österreich - Deutschland - Schweiz

Disciplines

Other Human Medicine, Health Sciences (100%)

Keywords

    Model Building, Methods And Guidance Development, Functional Form, Knowledge Translation, Cardiology, Variable Selection

Abstract Final report

In all medical fields, the correct evaluation of disease progression and treatment response are essential for the judgment and the improvement of therapies. Regression models with many risk factors are particularly important in the context of observational studies where groups of patients are likely to show structural inequalities. There are several distinct aims of such models : 1) to identify risk factors, which explain differences in the outcome of interest, 2) to describe the association between risk factors and the outcome of interest, and 3) to predict the outcome of interest. The statistical challenges for these three aims are different. Generally, the development of a valid descriptive model relies on two main steps: a) the identification of a meaningful number of risk factors, and b) the specification of the functional form of the association between these risk factors and the outcome of interest. Intensive statistical research on both aspects has been performed for decades. However, the results of this statistical research are only poorly incorporated into clinical research. The project Statistical Model Building Strategies for Cardiology intends to build a bridge between statistical research on model building and implementation of these methods into actual medical research by means of four typical research questions from cardiology. This transdisciplinary project aims at 1. identifying deficiencies in current cardiovascular applications with respect to statistical model building, 2. building advanced statistical models for the four research questions by applying state-of-the- art methods, 3. developing and evaluating new methods to correct the typical overestimation error arising in data-driven model building, and 4. providing guidance for model building strategies, which are understandable for applied researchers. From a statistical point of view, the aim is to identify, discuss and improve the current standards applied in clinical research with respect to model building. To guarantee that our methodologic results have a true impact in medical application, we develop and test our methods with four well defined research questions from cardiology. Our defined medical starting point is both as concrete as possible, but also has a broad potential for more general transferability. From a medical point of view, the aim of this project is to gain new medical insights from statistical models, which are built by employing better methodology. As a comprehensive result, we expect to deduce statistically improved and valid models for each of the four research questions. For this purpose, we will use several data sources of cardiologic studies and combine them with results from the corresponding medical literature.

In all medical fields, the correct evaluation of disease progression and treatment response are essential for the judgment and the improvement of therapies. Regression models with many prognostic factors are particularly important in the context of observational studies where different groups of patients are likely to show structural inequalities. There are several distinct aims of such models: 1) to identify prognostic factors, which explain differences in the outcome of interest, 2) to quantify the association between prognostic factors and the outcome of interest, and/or 3) to predict the outcome of interest. The statistical challenges for these three aims are different. Generally, the development of a valid descriptive model relies on two main steps: a) the identification of a meaningful number of prognostic factors, and b) the specification of the functional form of the association between these prognostic factors and the outcome of interest. Statistical research on both aspects has been performed for decades. However, the results of this statistical research are only poorly incorporated into clinical research. The project 'model building strategies in medical applications' intends to build a bridge between statistical research on model building and implementation of these methods into actual medical research in the field of cardiology. This transdisciplinary project aimed at 1.) identifying deficiencies in current cardiovascular applications with respect to statistical model building, 2.) developing new methods and evaluating already available methods of statistical model building focusing on the identification of prognostic factors for a final model and the specification of the functional form of continuous prognostic factors with the outcome, and 3.) providing guidance for model building strategies, which are understandable and applicable for applied researchers. From a statistical point of view, the aim was to identify, discuss and improve the current standards applied in clinical research with respect to model building. To guarantee that our methodologic results have a true impact in medical application, we developed and tested our methods with well-defined research questions from cardiology. Our defined medical starting point was both as concrete as possible, but also has a broad potential for more general transferability. From a medical point of view, the aim of this project was to develop guidelines aimed at analysts for modeling with all the special features of real data. In addition, we showed how new medical insights from statistical models, which are built by employing better methodology, can be gained. For this purpose, we used several data sources of cardiologic studies.

Research institution(s)
  • Medizinische Universität Wien - 100%
International project participants
  • Geraldine Rauch, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Germany
  • Heiko Becher, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg - Germany

Research Output

  • 171 Citations
  • 12 Publications
  • 7 Datasets & models
  • 2 Software
  • 5 Disseminations
Publications
  • 2024
    Title Statistical approaches for handling complex correlation structures in prediction modeling
    Type PhD Thesis
    Author Mariella, Gregorich
  • 2024
    Title Evaluating variable selection methods for multivariable regression models: A simulation study protocol
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0308543
    Type Journal Article
    Author Ullmann T
    Journal PLOS ONE
    Link Publication
  • 2023
    Title Causal Model Building in the Context of Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
    DOI 10.3390/ijerph20043182
    Type Journal Article
    Author Akbari N
    Journal International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    Pages 3182
    Link Publication
  • 2021
    Title Regression with Highly Correlated Predictors: Variable Omission Is Not the Solution
    DOI 10.3390/ijerph18084259
    Type Journal Article
    Author Gregorich M
    Journal International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    Pages 4259
    Link Publication
  • 2020
    Title Selection of variables for multivariable models: Opportunities and limitations in quantifying model stability by resampling
    DOI 10.1002/sim.8779
    Type Journal Article
    Author Wallisch C
    Journal Statistics in Medicine
    Pages 369-381
    Link Publication
  • 2022
    Title Review of guidance papers on regression modeling in statistical series of medical journals
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0262918
    Type Journal Article
    Author Wallisch C
    Journal PLoS ONE
    Link Publication
  • 2022
    Title Using Background Knowledge from Preceding Studies for Building a Random Forest Prediction Model: A Plasmode Simulation Study
    DOI 10.3390/e24060847
    Type Journal Article
    Author Hafermann L
    Journal Entropy
    Pages 847
    Link Publication
  • 2022
    Title Evaluating methods for Lasso selective inference in biomedical research: a comparative simulation study
    DOI 10.1186/s12874-022-01681-y
    Type Journal Article
    Author Kammer M
    Journal BMC Medical Research Methodology
    Pages 206
    Link Publication
  • 2020
    Title Evaluating methods for Lasso selective inference in biomedical research: a comparative simulation study
    Type PhD Thesis
    Author Michael, Kammer
    Link Publication
  • 2021
    Title Statistical model building: Background “knowledge” based on inappropriate preselection causes misspecification
    DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01373-z
    Type Journal Article
    Author Hafermann L
    Journal BMC Medical Research Methodology
    Pages 196
    Link Publication
  • 2021
    Title The roles of predictors in cardiovascular risk models - a question of modeling culture?
    DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01487-4
    Type Journal Article
    Author Wallisch C
    Journal BMC Medical Research Methodology
    Pages 284
    Link Publication
  • 2020
    Title Systematic review of education and practical guidance on regression modeling for medical researchers who lack a strong statistical background: Study protocol
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0241427
    Type Journal Article
    Author Bach P
    Journal PLOS ONE
    Link Publication
Datasets & models
  • 2023 Link
    Title Data for "Causal Model Building in the Context of Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review"
    DOI 10.17605/osf.io/vp7yj
    Type Database/Collection of data
    Public Access
    Link Link
  • 2022 Link
    Title Data for "Review of guidance papers on regression modeling in statistical series of medical journals"
    DOI 10.17605/osf.io/h74bj
    Type Database/Collection of data
    Public Access
    Link Link
  • 2022 Link
    Title Code and data for "Regression with Highly Correlated Predictors: Variable Omission Is Not the Solution"
    DOI 10.17605/osf.io/qkp7a
    Type Database/Collection of data
    Public Access
    Link Link
  • 2022 Link
    Title Code and data for "Evaluating methods for Lasso selective inference in biomedical research: a comparative simulation study"
    DOI 10.17605/osf.io/ahjc2
    Type Computer model/algorithm
    Public Access
    Link Link
  • 2021 Link
    Title Code and data for "Statistical Model Building: Background "Knowledge" Based on Inappropriate Preselection Causes Misspecification"
    DOI 10.17605/osf.io/vqp2u
    Type Computer model/algorithm
    Public Access
    Link Link
  • 2021 Link
    Title Data and code for "Selection of variables for multivariable models: Opportunities and limitations in quantifying model stability by resampling"
    DOI 10.17605/osf.io/k8qn6
    Type Computer model/algorithm
    Public Access
    Link Link
  • 2020 Link
    Title Case report forms for "Systematic review of education and practical guidance on regression modeling for medical researchers who lack a strong statistical background: Study protocol"
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0241427.s003
    Type Data analysis technique
    Public Access
    Link Link
Software
  • 2024 Link
    Title Interactive illustration of performance measures for estimated non-linear associations
    Link Link
  • 2022 Link
    Title "Bend your (sp)line" shiny application
    Link Link
Disseminations
  • 0
    Title "Statistics in Organ Transplantation" interest group
    Type A talk or presentation
  • 0
    Title Covid-19 Future Operations
    Type A talk or presentation
  • 0
    Title Forum Junge Statistik
    Type A talk or presentation
  • 0
    Title Medical University of Vienna
    Type A talk or presentation
  • 0 Link
    Title SAMBA workshop in Nov 2023
    Type Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
    Link Link

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Twitter, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • Acknowledgements
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF