• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
      • Research Radar Archives 1974–1994
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Elly Tanaka
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • Impact Stories
      • Verena Gassner
      • Wolfgang Lechner
      • Georg Winter
    • scilog Magazine
    • Austrian Science Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF ASTRA Awards
      • FWF START Awards
      • Award Ceremony
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • ERA-NET TRANSCAN
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership BrainHealth
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • WE&ME Award
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Korea
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol–South Tyrol–Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
      • Expiring Programs
        • Elise Richter and Elise Richter PEEK
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open-Access Policy
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • , external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

The Concept of Intrinsic Evil

The Concept of Intrinsic Evil

Nenad Polgar (ORCID: 0000-0002-2631-0707)
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/M1946
  • Funding program Lise Meitner
  • Status ended
  • Start February 8, 2016
  • End February 7, 2018
  • Funding amount € 147,020
  • Project website

Disciplines

Philosophy, Ethics, Religion (100%)

Keywords

    Intrinsic Evil, Tradition, Absolute Moral Norms, Magisterium of the Catholic Church, Traditionalist and Revisionists

Abstract Final report

The starting point of the project that is situated in the field of Theological Ethics is a curious observation, namely that intrinsic evil, a normative term predominantly associated with Catholic sexual ethics, seems to be expanding in its usage so that it is now frequently invoked in other theological disciplines, Church practice, and even interventions of representatives of the Church in public discourse. Broadly described, the term intrinsic evil refers to those acts that are always morally wrong, no matter the circumstances and intention of the agent. The recent development in the usage of the term demands a thorough investigation of the concept behind the term in order to explore its origin(s) and meaning(s) within theological tradition by employing a historical-critical analysis, and to assess its contemporary relevance. Since the project aims at a more thorough understanding of one of the most fundamental concepts used in contemporary theological ethics and the moral doctrine of the Catholic Church, the results of this study might have far reaching implications. At the very least, the study will question the legitimacy of this trend of expanding the usage of the notion of intrinsic evil by determining its methodological (ir)relevancy as a tool of ethical analysis. However, pending the results of the study and a possibility that the concept of intrinsic evil, as well as the theological structure that supports it, might prove obsolete (or in need of a serious re-interpretation), such an outcome will certainly re-ignite the Catholic debate on various issues in both fundamental theological ethics and applied ethics. Furthermore, having a clearer theological concept of intrinsic evil may also be of significant benefit for evaluating Catholic interventions in the political sphere, because this provides a necessary tool for assessing the motives and goals of those that use it. Since there is a good chance that the concept of intrinsic evil cannot survive a closer scrutiny, this project should be seen as a stepping stone in a larger project of finding a more adequate basis for contemporary Catholic sexual ethics and the related engagement of the Catholic Church on these issues in the political sphere.

The starting point of this project was a curious observation that the concept of intrinsic evil, associated mostly with Catholic sexual ethics during the second half of the twentieth century, seems to have become a foundational tool of ethical analysis in Catholic theological ethics. In that process, the concept has also been expanded in its usage so that it is now frequently invoked in other theological disciplines, Church practice, and even politics. Within sexual ethics the concept is usually taken to mean that there are acts or kinds of acts that are always morally wrong, no matter the intention, circumstances, or context in which they are performed. Against that background, the project first engaged with an exploration of historical origins of the concept in theological thought. Although those who employ the concept of intrinsic evil nowadays invoke theological authorities such as Augustine (4th 5th century) and Aquinas (13th century), the term itself was not employed in theological writings until the 14th century. The first significant finding of the project was that the historical development of the concept of intrinsic evil reveals that it is actually an umbrella concept that managed to integrate elements of diverse theological systems. Despite the fact that its appearance on the theological stage in the 14th century was strictly tied to a reference to the material aspect of an act analysis, this conceptual precision was lost in subsequent centuries. Thus, already by the time of Francisco Suarez (16th century) and especially during the manulist period in the Catholic Church (16th 20th century), it became impossible to spell-out the defining characteristics of intrinsically evil acts, i.e. what the concept of intrinsic evil actually means. The second significant finding is that this confusion surrounding the concept of intrinsic evil followed its introduction into official documents of the Catholic magisterium. This is demonstrated in the project by an analysis of these documents which shows the diversity of employed terminology (in reference to the concept), lack of any clear definition of what is meant by these terms, and a heavy reliance on the manualist period writings and their understanding of the specification and evaluation of human acts. Because of this, the thesis that the concept of intrinsic evil is a part of the moral doctrine of the Church is highly problematic. Finally, the third significant finding of the project is the result of an exploration of (theological and other) reasons that prompt various theologians and other writers to keep employing the concept in their works or public actions. These are not only related to ignorance about the historical origins of the concept and its ambiguity, but, primarily, to various traditionalist theological and reactionary political projects within which the concept is used as a symbol of a certain way of thinking, portrayed as an ethical analysis of controversial (i.e. theologically and politically interesting) classes of acts.

Research institution(s)
  • Universität Wien - 100%
International project participants
  • Edward Vacek, Loyola University New Orleans - USA

Research Output

  • 1 Citations
  • 2 Publications
Publications
  • 2018
    Title On the Relevance of the Concept of Intrinsic Evil: Francisco Suárez and Contemporary Catholic Virtue Ethics Approaches
    DOI 10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.185121
    Type Journal Article
    Author Polgar N
    Journal De Ethica. A Journal of Philosophical, Theological and Applied Ethics
    Pages 21-36
    Link Publication
  • 2017
    Title Reframing Catholic Theological Ethics from a Scotistic Perspective
    DOI 10.3390/rel8100200
    Type Journal Article
    Author Polgar N
    Journal Religions
    Pages 200
    Link Publication

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • , external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • Acknowledgements
  • IFG-Form
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF