Disciplines
Philosophy, Ethics, Religion (100%)
Keywords
Rudolf Carnap,
Otto Neurath,
Vienna Circle,
Logical Empiricism,
Scientific World-Conception,
Philosophy of Science
Abstract
Rudolf Carnap (18911970) and Otto Neurath (18821945) were two central members of the
Vienna Circle and thus decisively determined the development of the scientific world view of
logical empiricism. Contrary to a long-held cliché, this movement is neither uncritically
devoted to natural science, nor a truly unified school in the conventional sense. Carnap and
Neurath, who were both part of the so-called left wing of the circle, did not only share their
political convictions, but also the anti-metaphysical attitude. Aside of this there were
profound philosophical differences. The discussion of points of contention, however, took
place in the publications of Carnap and Neurath only in a strongly attenuated, more implicit
manner: in the midst of philosophically and politically hostile environment, it was important
to emphasize cohesion; disagreements were chiefly discussed in small groups or in
correspondence.
The contributions to this volume illuminate from different perspectives the intricate
relations between these two key thinkers. The first part focuses on the prehistory, the different
philosophical imprints, from Herbartianism to Empiriocriticism. The second part reconstructs
the philosophical debates about the unity of science and intersubjectivity (physicalism) as
well as the basis of experience and the structure of cognition (protocol theorem debate) to the
question of the possibility and scope of formally oriented approaches and semantics, which
was controversially discussed by Carnap and Neurath. The contributions of the third part are
devoted to the relationship to contemporaries such as Ludwig Wittgenstein, Bertrand Russell
and Kurt Gödel as well as to Neuraths work in educational theory and his ideological
analyses developed in exile in England.
Common to the essays included here is the use of previously unpublished sources,
especially the extensive correspondence, which is indispensable for reconstructing the
development of one of the most important philosophical currents of the 20 th century in the
midst of dark times.