• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
      • Research Radar Archives 1974–1994
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Elly Tanaka
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • Impact Stories
      • Verena Gassner
      • Wolfgang Lechner
      • Georg Winter
    • scilog Magazine
    • Austrian Science Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF ASTRA Awards
      • FWF START Awards
      • Award Ceremony
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • ERA-NET TRANSCAN
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership BrainHealth
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • WE&ME Award
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol–South Tyrol–Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
      • Expiring Programs
        • Elise Richter and Elise Richter PEEK
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open-Access Policy
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • , external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

Performance or Score? Opera reviewed in German journalism in the 18th century

Performance or Score? Opera reviewed in German journalism in the 18th century

Andrea Horz (ORCID: 0000-0001-5045-6274)
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/T788
  • Funding program Hertha Firnberg
  • Status ended
  • Start August 1, 2015
  • End July 31, 2018
  • Funding amount € 226,530
  • Project website

Disciplines

Arts (100%)

Keywords

    Opera, Music Journalism, 18th century music, Music Theory, Piano Score

Abstract Final report

Discussions in recent years within operatic studies have revolved around the establishment of a methodological approach that puts the experience of the performance itself in the center. How did this shift in thought occur that judges the opera not solely by its stage presence but rather only by the musical score? In order to better understand the historical relationships of this constellation, which is described by some musical historians as almost dichotomous, one must look to the 18th century. At this time a discourse began to form that was less interested in the effect of an opera performance but on examining the score. The goal of this project is to identify these shifts in discourse within musical journalism literature about the opera within the German-speaking region in the 18th century that accompanies the use of piano reduction and the score. In order to close these gaps in academic knowledge, the respective articles about the opera in periodicals published within the German-speaking region need to be examined. What significance does music have in these articles? Does the critic base their statements on the musical text itself? Further examination also focuses on the following topics: shifts in the tendencies, trends and subjects of the operatic discourse via the use of piano reduction and scores, training of a musical-analytic critique-culture that focuses on the musical text, the relationship between the availability of printed scores and the canonization of certain opera composers, as well as the interaction with the older repertoire. Based on these studies it will also be possible to complete individual studies regarding the perception of certain composers within the larger discourse of contemporary musical debates. Moreover, these studies will allow reflecting on the historical horizon of the fundamental methodical discussions currently being held. .

Discussions in recent years within operatic studies have revolved around the establishment of a methodological approach that puts the experience of the performance itself at the centre. How did this shift in thought occur, which judges the opera not solely on its stage presence but rather only on the musical score? In order to better understand the historical relationships of this constellation, which is described by some musical historians as almost dichotomous, the musicologist Andrea Horz undertook the task of focusing on discourse formations in the German-speaking area of the 18th century. At this time a discourse began to form that was less interested in the effect of an opera performance than on the examination of the score. The goal of this project was to identify these formations in discourse within musical journalism literature on the opera within the German-speaking region in the 18th century. Results Only operatic music published in print was considered worthy of criticism It transpires that in the eighteenth century a critique was delimited from other forms of discussion such as performance reports and news from opera performances in different locations. Only prints were considered worthy of criticism, because only then did the composer hand over his work to the public for evaluation. Handwritten operatic music scores - in German-speaking countries even beyond the 18th century norm - therefore gained only rare attention in the magazines as the subject of the review, under very specific conditions. It was also customary to judge operas on the basis of vocal scores, despite access to handwritten full scores. Only a shift in aesthetic discourse produced an operatic criticism directed to music In addition to the availability of printed operatic scores, a corresponding discourse formation was also required, which not only considered the libretto as worthy of criticism, but also wanted to apply this form of public evaluation to music. This discourse shift goes hand in hand with the aesthetic reorientations of the 18th century. Opera reviewers were connected The genre "operatic critique" was not an invention of individuals working in isolation in different places. The actors who determined the music-public discourse were closely connected. No linear evolution towards a music analytical critique Speaking of operatic music in the 18th century can by no means be described as a straightforward development, for example towards a music-analytical review culture. According to the aesthetic orientations, the discourse modalities were always under discussion.

Research institution(s)
  • Universität Wien - 100%

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • , external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • Acknowledgements
  • IFG-Form
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF