• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
      • Research Radar Archives 1974–1994
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Elly Tanaka
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • Impact Stories
      • Verena Gassner
      • Wolfgang Lechner
      • Georg Winter
    • scilog Magazine
    • Austrian Science Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF ASTRA Awards
      • FWF START Awards
      • Award Ceremony
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • ERA-NET TRANSCAN
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership BE READY
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership BrainHealth
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • LUKE – Ukraine
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • WE&ME Award
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Korea
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol–South Tyrol–Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
      • Expiring Programs
        • Elise Richter and Elise Richter PEEK
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open-Access Policy
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • , external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

Liberal and Islamic Democratic Theory

Liberal and Islamic Democratic Theory

Dunja Larise (ORCID: 0000-0002-4080-3719)
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/J3393
  • Funding program Erwin Schrödinger
  • Status ended
  • Start February 1, 2013
  • End March 31, 2016
  • Funding amount € 146,030

Disciplines

Political Science (100%)

Keywords

    Democratic Theory, Inequality, Islamic Democracy, Social Movements

Abstract Final report

The global financial crisis and the emergence of the new social movements like Occupy, Indignados or 99%, reacting to the rising inequality by formulating the quest for social justice as the quest for genuine democracy, have once again revealed the decisiveness of the problem of inequality for democratic theory and institutions. The concept of Islamic democracy, re-emerging from the events surrounding the Arab Spring, appeared as a possible alternative to liberal democracy and as an authentic democratic solution for the Arab world concerning primarily the questions of legitimacy, re-presentation, decision-making and inequality, both at the global and nation-state level. In the West, Islamic democracy has most frequently been conceived of as a liberal Islamic response to Islamic fundamentalism and by its advocates in the Arab region as an authentic Islamic alternative to Western dominated liberal democracy, later being regarded as ill equipped to address the problems of unequal global development and poverty. The concept of Islamic democracy offered convincing narratives in favour of social justice, thereby gaining a strong potential for grass-root mobilisation. The events of the second phase of the Arab Spring (after the authoritarian secular governments in Egypt and Tunisia were toppled) and the establishment of the political blocks ascribing to Islamic democracy like Ennahda in Tunisia and Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, saw the continuing undiminished quest for "real democracy" and "social justice". The post-Arab Spring social demands, such as those articulated by the re-emergent Tahrir movement in Egypt and Kasserine uprising in Tunisia, seem to follow similar agendas to the new social movements Occupy, Democracia real! and 99% by challenging the social and economic regimes imbedded in the representative system of both liberal and emerging Islamic democracies. Hence, there is a call for "real democracy" beyond the traditional liberal economic framework, that poses the same structural limit to both Islamic and liberal democracies. The central objective of the project addresses the issues of inequality and social justice within the framework of Islamic and liberal democratic theories and political practices: firstly, by analysing the normative theoretic grounds of both political concepts contemporary liberal democracy and modern Islamic democracy in a comparative manner, focusing on the role of inequality in both theoretical narratives; secondly, by examining the inferences of globalisation, institutional change and financial crisis with democratic theories concerned; and thirdly, by searching for the shared understanding of what "real democracy" should comprise in the eyes of Arab and Western social movements.

A serial of revolutionary events started to spread over the Middle East and North African region in Spring 2011. These events raised hopes in an almost overnight democratization of this region. Once again, the revolutionary uprisings were dubbed "Spring" echoing enthusiastic hopes, similar to those of 1848 or in 1968 in Europe, in which political revolutions were seen as radical turning points towards more just and democratic societies. With Egypts violent counter-revolution of July, 3 and August 14 of 2013 that returned that country to military dictatorship and with the tragic developments in Syria it has become clear that the "Arab Spring" can not deliver on hopes set into it. The events surrounding the rise and subsequent fall of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt were testimonials of the continuing undiminished quest for "real democracy" and "social justice". The post-Arab Spring social demands, such as those articulated by the general strike of the Egyptian worker unions, social unrests as the consequence of the failed attempt of the Brotherhood to achieve social consent among Egyptians and finally a de facto military coup in Egypt unveiled the lacking ability of the Brotherhood and their concept of Islamic democracy to sustain a durable and stabile government. This project addresses the issues of inequality and social justice within the framework of Islamic and liberal democratic theories and political practices: firstly, by analysing the normative theoretic grounds of both political concepts - contemporary liberal democracy and modern Islamic democracy - in a comparative manner, focusing on the role of inequality in both theoretical narratives; secondly, by examining the reasons for the failure of Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood to raise up to the demands of Egyptian labour movement and religious minorities and their consequent inability to hold the power; and thirdly, by searching for the shared understanding of what "real democracy" should comprise in the eyes of Arab and Western social movements.

Research institution(s)
  • Institut für Höhere Studien - IHS - 100%
  • Yale University - 100%

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • , external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • Acknowledgements
  • IFG-Form
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF