• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
      • Research Radar Archives 1974–1994
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Elly Tanaka
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • Impact Stories
      • Verena Gassner
      • Wolfgang Lechner
      • Georg Winter
    • scilog Magazine
    • Austrian Science Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF ASTRA Awards
      • FWF START Awards
      • Award Ceremony
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • ERA-NET TRANSCAN
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership BrainHealth
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • WE&ME Award
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol–South Tyrol–Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
      • Expiring Programs
        • Elise Richter and Elise Richter PEEK
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open-Access Policy
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • , external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

Shinto-Buddhist Syncretism in Japan´s Early Modern Period - the Case of Yoshida Shinto

Shinto-Buddhist Syncretism in Japan´s Early Modern Period - the Case of Yoshida Shinto

Sepp Linhart (ORCID: )
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/P13760
  • Funding program Principal Investigator Projects
  • Status ended
  • Start November 1, 1999
  • End December 31, 2001
  • Funding amount € 76,969
  • Project website

Disciplines

Philosophy, Ethics, Religion (30%); Linguistics and Literature (70%)

Keywords

    JAPAN, RELIGION, SYNKRETISMUS, SHINTO, YOSHIDA SHINTO

Abstract Final report

Research project P 13760 Yoshida Shinto Sepp LINHART 28.06.1999 This project is a contribution to one fundamental question in the research of Japanese Shinto: when did there emerge a self-image of Shinto as a religion? When and in which way did Shinto priests perceive of themselves as representatives of a distinct, independent, and comprehensive religious system? Traditionally Shinto has been regarded as such a system since times immemorial. Recent Japanese studies, however, have weakened this opinion. According to them, indigenous forms of Japanese religion were originally rather heterogeneous, regionally and even locally. Due to the example of Buddhism a process of unification and codification commenced. Thereby, Buddhist monks interfered into questions concerning the nature of Japanese deities (kami) and indigenous believes became part of a syncretistic system dominated by Buddhism. An independent Shinto theology was created only as a reaction to such developments in the Japanese Middle Ages (12. 16. cent.). In this process Yoshida Shinto performed a significant role. Founded by the shrine priest Yoshida Kanetomo Yoshida Shinto expounds a teaching which - for the first time in Shinto history -explicitly regards itself as a religious system distinct from Buddhism. Kami-centred believes thus became a ,way" of moral and practical behaviour. At the same time, this teaching was allegedly of great antiquity. Moreover it was regarded the basis of other teachings like Confucianism or Buddhism. Thus the Yoshida explained the overwhelming similarities between their Shinto and these teachings. By its own terms Yoshida Shinto therefore appears independent and fundamental, in its contents, however, it is still strongly influenced by Chinese and Buddhist thought. Yet it was a decisive step in the development of the now common notion that regards Shinto and Buddhism as two different religious systems. Since Yoshida Shinto has vanished almost completely, its importance can hardly be grasped today. Already by the end of the Edo-period (1600-1868), the Yoshida under the pressure of constant critique by more recent Shinto ideas renounced their teachings to a certain degree. After the Meiji restoration it was finally abolished by an official degree. In the first half of the Edo-period, however, Yoshida Shinto was apparently regarded as something like a Shinto orthodoxy and had a tremendous influence. How did it gain this status and which developments led to its eventual decline? These are the central questions of this project.

The so-called Yoshida Shinto, which is the focal point of this research project, originated in a period of overwhelming Buddhist influence on Japanese religious history. Yoshida Shinto testifies to this influence. More precisely, Yoshida Shinto can be portrayed as composed of elements taken from traditional worship of indigenous deities, as well as elements taken from esoteric Buddhism, Chinese cosmology and Yin-Yang doctrines. The project deals primarily with the question why it was precisely this ultimately syncretistic religious teaching that initiated a renaissance of indigenous deities and accompanying beliefs. As a first result we may state that in historical perspective Yoshida Shinto`s most crucial innovation was the promulgation of a distinct religious system under the name of "Shinto" ("way of the gods") which was most notably independent from Buddhism. In this connection, it cannot be overemphasized that such a "Shinto" (in the now familiar sense, that is, as an independent indigenous religion) did not exist in the common religious understanding of the time and had still had to be created. The result - Yoshida Shinto - may be indebted to other religions from a modern point of view but was in its time the only religious alternative to Buddhism. Moreover, it initiated a development that increasingy rejected "foreign" elements from the newly discovered indigenous "way." This development soon went far beyond the initial aims of Yoshida Shinto. In the end Yoshida Shinto itself became the object of xenophobia initiated by its own religious doctrine. The present research concentrates on the evaluation of Yoshida Shinto`s religious impact during the Edo Period (1600-1868). It is generally known that in spite of the above mentioned critique, which was limited mainly to intellectual circles, the Yoshida family successfully established themselves as the highest authority in Shinto matters. Most notably, they secured a kind of monopoly in the administration of lesser shrines throughout the entire country. It is still quite unclear, however, which competences were connected with this position, what circumstances led to the Yoshida`s eventual decline and how Yoshida Shinto influenced the notion of Shinto in general. These questions shall be further investigated in the course of this project.

Research institution(s)
  • Universität Wien - 100%
Project participants
  • Klaus Antoni, associated research partner
International project participants
  • Marcus Teeuwen, University of Oslo - Norway

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • , external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • Acknowledgements
  • IFG-Form
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF