• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
      • Research Radar Archives 1974–1994
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Elly Tanaka
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • Impact Stories
      • Verena Gassner
      • Wolfgang Lechner
      • Georg Winter
    • scilog Magazine
    • Austrian Science Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF ASTRA Awards
      • FWF START Awards
      • Award Ceremony
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • ERA-NET TRANSCAN
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership BE READY
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership BrainHealth
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • LUKE – Ukraine
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • WE&ME Award
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Korea
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol–South Tyrol–Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
      • Expiring Programs
        • Elise Richter and Elise Richter PEEK
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open-Access Policy
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • , external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

The quality of therapy motivation

The quality of therapy motivation

Thomas Slunecko (ORCID: 0000-0002-0199-5527)
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/P14318
  • Funding program Principal Investigator Projects
  • Status ended
  • Start April 1, 2001
  • End February 28, 2003
  • Funding amount € 15,425
  • Project website

Disciplines

Health Sciences (10%); Clinical Medicine (10%); Psychology (80%)

Keywords

    PSYHOTHERAPIEFORSCHUNG, QUALITATIVE FORSCHUNG, THERAPIEMOTIVATION, SUBJEKTIVE KRANKHEITSTHEORIEN

Abstract Final report

Research project P 14318 The Quality of therapy motivation Thomas SLUNECKO 26.6.2000 Over the past few years, the claim for a qualitative and practice-centered re-orientation of psychotherapy research has become increasingly explicit. The background of this development can be seen in the growing awareness that psychotherapy`s subject matter essentially consists of highly complex, non-linear, and partly non-obvious communication processes, which can only insufficiently be grasped with a purely quantitative research methodology based on a traditional understanding of the natural sciences. Furthermore, the results generated by this research programme are insufficiently applicable to the needs and problems of practitioners. In order to expand the methodological approach towards a naturalistic, life-world-based psychotherapy research, one of the most predominant tasks lies in consolidating, by means of inductive systematization, the natural-language reports given by the parties involved in the therapy. Content-wise, the proposed project is focussed on clients` and therapists` statements on the (perceived) therapy motivation. This is a variable of central importance for the explication of the access to psychotherapy in so far as the therapist`s perception of this motivation and its congruence with his or her own conceptions of the treatment lays the track for the decision on indication and thus for the ensuing `therapeutic fate` of the client. In the first part of the project open answers pertaining to therapy motivation will be used to develop a reliable scheme of categories by means of qualitative content analysis. This scheme is then employed to assess the importance of different kinds of therapy motivation as well as of the congruence between the client`s motivation and therapist`s offer or the therapist`s perception of the motivation respectively, for the access to and the outcome of outpatient psychotherapy. An additional aim of this project is to examine whether this scheme of categories can be applied to illustrate changes in motivation during the therapy as postulated in research literature.

Patients` motivation is one of the most decisive factors for successful psychotherapy. Motivation, however, not only amounts to a quantitative entity, but the kind of this motivation is essential. That a patient`s specific motivation matches with the therapist`s intention , e.g., is at least equally relevant to how much he is motivated. Our basic research goal was to develop an instrument for representing the specific quality of a patient`s therapy motivation in a clear and reliable way. Before their first interview at a therapeutic out-patient centre, we asked 202 prospective patients, to respond to an open question regarding their motivation to seek psychotherapy. Based on a content analysis of their written answers, we suggest a system of 16 motif categories. The system is well documented through definitions, anchor examples, and coding rules and can easily be adopted for further research. We notice that frequently patients simply wish to talk to someone and be supported - a rather unspecific motif that previous research logic, oriented on patients` problems and goals as it was, obviously has been hiding. Patients` motives, as categorized by our instrument, correlate with indication to therapy. Those who are motivated by their own potential, by insight or who want to regain their love of live more often are referred to group, couple, or family therapy; these patients are also younger than average. On the other hand, 8 patients, all of them women, are not considered for therapy at all. They are significantly older than average and had indicated recommendation by others, depression, and suffering when asked for their motivation to seek therapy. We identify them as problem children` of the therapy system: referred by their doctors or their relatives, they show up at the ambulance with little motivation or capacity for self-reflection - and are sent away despite of their subjective suffering. Noticeable, patients who had been in therapy before, significantly tended to report motives that were categorized as wish to talk to someone and be supported and suffering. Significantly less often these experienced patients indicated critical life events and job-related problems. This, along with some similar findings, could be interpreted as an effect of learning or as the patients` adaptation to the expectations of the therapeutic system.

Research institution(s)
  • Universität Wien - 100%
Project participants
  • Christian Korunka, Universität Wien , associated research partner

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • , external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • Acknowledgements
  • IFG-Form
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF