• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
      • Research Radar Archives 1974–1994
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Elly Tanaka
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • Impact Stories
      • Verena Gassner
      • Wolfgang Lechner
      • Georg Winter
    • scilog Magazine
    • Austrian Science Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF ASTRA Awards
      • FWF START Awards
      • Award Ceremony
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • ERA-NET TRANSCAN
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership BrainHealth
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • WE&ME Award
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol–South Tyrol–Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
      • Expiring Programs
        • Elise Richter and Elise Richter PEEK
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open-Access Policy
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • , external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

Individual tree growth efficiency of Norway spruce

Individual tree growth efficiency of Norway spruce

Hubert Sterba (ORCID: )
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/P20159
  • Funding program Principal Investigator Projects
  • Status ended
  • Start April 1, 2008
  • End September 30, 2011
  • Funding amount € 221,999
  • Project website

Disciplines

Agriculture and Forestry, Fishery (100%)

Keywords

    Growth Efficiency, Picea abies, Leaf Area, Potentially Available Area

Abstract Final report

The relationship between forest stand growth and stand density is an expression of the efficiency of growing space on the stand level. Many authors confirm the existence of an optimum density, i.e. all other factors constant, a stand density, where growth exhibits a maximum. Below this optimum density, the individual trees have better growing conditions, i.e. more light and other resources, thus grow better, but cannot compensate anymore the growth of the trees that have been removed in order to lower the stand density. At densities above the optimum it is hypothesised that the proportion of trees which use their part of the stand area inefficiently, is so high, that total stand growth declines. However, there is a lack of investigations in individual tree growth efficiency related to the potentially available area of trees. Individual tree efficiency is frequently defined as growth per unit of crown projection area, or per unit of individual tree leaf area. Both measures do not add up to stand area, and cannot separate the effect of growing space available for the given crown projection area or leaf area. The hypothesis to be tested in this project is that there is an optimum individual tree leaf area index. Besides its size and social position, a tree will be characterised by (i) its volume increment, (ii) its leaf area, and its potentially available part of the stand area. The latter one will be derived by dividing stand area into very little squares, which are attributed to that tree, for which the ratio of its distance to the square and its leaf area is a minimum. In this way, the a found potentially available stand areas are distributed proportionally to leaf area and all together add up to the stand area, because every square of the stand is attributed to one of its trees. Growth efficiency is then defined as volume increment per attributed area, and individual tree leaf area index is defined as leaf area per attributed stand area. The data will be gathered in 8 pure Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) stands. There will be four stand types, each of them in a thinned and in an unthinned version. The four stand types will represent three age classes and one uneven-aged structured stand. All trees in the stands will be mapped, and increment cores will be taken. For appropriate leaf area determination in each stand 30 trees will be felled, representing three crown classes and each of the whole range of estimated individual leaf area index, taking early sapwood area as a proxy for leaf area. The felled trees will be used to determine (i) their volume increment, and (ii) their leaf area. From the mapping and the leaf area the attributed stand area will be calculated. With these data the hypothesis of an optimum individual tree leaf area index will be tested in each stand individually, and afterwards tested, if it differs by the factors age class, and even-aged-uneven-aged structure, recently thinned or not thinned.

The relationship between forest stand growth and stand density is an expression of the efficiency of growing space on the stand level. Many authors confirm the existence of an optimum density, i.e. all other factors constant, a stand density, where growth exhibits a maximum. Below this optimum density, the individual trees have better growing conditions, i.e. more light and other resources, thus grow better, but cannot compensate anymore the growth of the trees that have been removed in order to lower the stand density. At densities above the optimum it is hypothesised that the proportion of trees which use their part of the stand area inefficiently, is so high, that total stand growth declines. However, there is a lack of investigations in individual tree growth efficiency related to the potentially available area of trees. Individual tree efficiency is frequently defined as growth per unit of crown projection area, or per unit of individual tree leaf area. Both measures do not add up to stand area, and cannot separate the effect of growing space available for the given crown projection area or leaf area. The hypothesis to be tested in this project is that there is an optimum individual tree leaf area index. Besides its size and social position, a tree will be characterised by (i) its volume increment, (ii) its leaf area, and its potentially available part of the stand area. The latter one will be derived by dividing stand area into very little squares, which are attributed to that tree, for which the ratio of its distance to the square and its leaf area is a minimum. In this way, the a found potentially available stand areas are distributed proportionally to leaf area and all together add up to the stand area, because every square of the stand is attributed to one of its trees. Growth efficiency is then defined as volume increment per attributed area, and individual tree leaf area index is defined as leaf area per attributed stand area. The data will be gathered in 8 pure Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) stands. There will be four stand types, each of them in a thinned and in an unthinned version. The four stand types will represent three age classes and one uneven-aged structured stand. All trees in the stands will be mapped, and increment cores will be taken. For appropriate leaf area determination in each stand 30 trees will be felled, representing three crown classes and each of the whole range of estimated individual leaf area index, taking early sapwood area as a proxy for leaf area. The felled trees will be used to determine (i) their volume increment, and (ii) their leaf area. From the mapping and the leaf area the attributed stand area will be calculated. With these data the hypothesis of an optimum individual tree leaf area index will be tested in each stand individually, and afterwards tested, if it differs by the factors age class, and even-aged-uneven-aged structure, recently thinned or not thinned.

Research institution(s)
  • Universität für Bodenkultur Wien - 100%

Research Output

  • 125 Citations
  • 3 Publications
Publications
  • 2012
    Title The relationship between available area efficiency and area exploitation index in an even-aged coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) stand
    DOI 10.1093/forestry/cps052
    Type Journal Article
    Author Gspaltl M
    Journal Forestry
    Pages 567-577
    Link Publication
  • 2010
    Title Applicability of non-destructive substitutes for leaf area in different stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) focusing on traditional forest crown measures
    DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.048
    Type Journal Article
    Author Laubhann D
    Journal Forest Ecology and Management
    Pages 1498-1506
    Link Publication
  • 2013
    Title Leaf area and light use efficiency patterns of Norway spruce under different thinning regimes and age classes
    DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.044
    Type Journal Article
    Author Gspaltl M
    Journal Forest Ecology and Management
    Pages 49-59
    Link Publication

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • , external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • Acknowledgements
  • IFG-Form
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF