• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
      • Research Radar Archives 1974–1994
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Elly Tanaka
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • Impact Stories
      • Verena Gassner
      • Wolfgang Lechner
      • Birgit Mitter
      • Oliver Spadiut
      • Georg Winter
    • scilog Magazine
    • Austrian Science Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF ASTRA Awards
      • FWF START Awards
      • Award Ceremony
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership BE READY
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership BrainHealth
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • LUKE – Ukraine
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • WE&ME Award
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Korea
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol-South Tyrol-Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
      • Expiring Programs
        • Elise Richter and Elise Richter PEEK
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open-Access Policy
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • , external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

Comparative analysis of ovine and human spinal biomechanics

Comparative analysis of ovine and human spinal biomechanics

Theresia F. Licka (ORCID: 0000-0001-7651-5180)
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/P24020
  • Funding program Principal Investigator Projects
  • Status ended
  • Start December 1, 2011
  • End June 30, 2016
  • Funding amount € 248,288
  • Project website

Disciplines

Other Technical Sciences (80%); Biology (10%); Veterinary Medicine (10%)

Keywords

    Spine, Human, Biomechanics, Ovine, Comparative, Stabilization

Abstract Final report

Prior to the use of spinal implants in clinical practice, implants undergo testing procedures such as biocompatibility and mechanical testing, finite element analysis and in-vitro testing in human and animal cadaveric spines. Then, implants are assessed in-vivo using animal models to identify surgical complications, and after euthanasia further in-vitro testing of implant stability is carried out. The ovine species is frequently used for these tests, as in-vitro and anatomical studies have identified the ovine and human spine to be similar. In-vivo ovine spinal kinematic data however are not known. The aim of the proposed study is to obtain comparative in-vivo thoracolumbar spinal kinematics and muscle function in sheep and humans obtaining diagnostic images of the human and sheep spine and relevant musculature, obtaining spinal kinematics and muscle activation data from sheep and humans and to analyse the integrative mechanisms of spinal kinematics and stabilization methods identifying variables significant for translational application from the ovine to human spine for future spinal implant research. The following hypotheses will be tested: a) Maximum and minimum angles and mean range of motion of the human thoracolumbar spine during a motion cycle at walk and run are more closely represented by the ovine spine during trot rather than walk, due to the similar diagonally reciprocal nature of the human walk and run and the quadrupedal trot. b) Sheep will demonstrate a muscle activation ratio of rectus abdominis to oblique externus closer to 1 during walk compared to the human during walk, as sheep require a greater need for stability against extension forces due to their spinal alignment. c) MRI assessed muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and CSA to fatty infiltrate ratio are inversely correlated to degenerative spinal changes and age, but directly correlated to EMG in both the human and sheep. Two different age ranges of sheep (n=24) and human volunteers (n=24) will be examined using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), ultrasonography and radiography. Spinal kinematics and muscle activation data from sheep at stance, at walk and trot; and from the human during 4 point kneeling, bipedal stance and during walking and running will be obtained. Intra-individual and inter-individual species differences of movement and muscle activation patterns in the different measurement situations will be tested using Analysis of variance (ANOVA), and correlations between kinematic measurements, EMG activity and MRI appearance of the muscles will be documented. Availability of the biomechanics and muscular stabilization of the ovine spine will allow future in- vivo spinal implant studies to collect relevant data with similar methodology for enhanced translation to human medicine. The proposed study therefore provides the necessary baseline data required to bring forward a new dimension to the evaluation of spinal implant functionality in the future.

Before spinal implants come into clinical use, these are first tested in vitro and also in-vivo in animals, in order to identify the main complications of surgery; mainly post-mortem evaluations of the animals used are performed. Because in-vitro and anatomical studies have noted a similarity between the sheep spine and the human spinal column, sheep are often used for these studies. Prior to the beginning of the present study, the movement of the ovine spine had not been compared with the movement of the human spinal column, and therefore no basic data for transferring results in the sheep to the human had been established. Consequently, the present study collected data of comparative in vivo kinematics and muscle function of the thoracolumbar spine of sheep and humans, supported by imaging techniques. This allowed for a more data based comparative analysis of integrative mechanisms of spinal kinematics and spine stabilization with numerous parameters examined.First, the sheep were accustomed to the treadmill and in contrast to horses it could be established that sheep needed more than 5 treadmill training sessions to achieve a consistent movement on the treadmill. From the magnetic resonance images collected in sheep and in humans, the analysis of the lumbar extensor muscles showed that muscle fatty infiltration and muscle volumes were identified by different evaluators with excellent reliability except for the multifidii muscles, where the reliability was acceptable. In the human individuals studied, age and body mass index were identified as significant influences on the muscle fatty infiltration of the lumbar extensor muscles, but not of the lumbar flexor muscles. The different volumes and shapes of the lumbar muscles of humans and sheep showed the different bio-mechanical and functional requirements that each of the two species meet, this is of particular importance when using sheep as surgical models for the people. Comparison of muscle activity and active movements of the lumbar spine in humans and in sheep showed very significant differences. Also, the details of muscle fatty infiltrations in sheep showed, unlike in humans, much more such zones in the magnetic resonance examination, this a substantial limitation of direct transmission of results of sheep studies on humans.

Research institution(s)
  • Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien - 100%
International project participants
  • James M. Elliott, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine - USA

Research Output

  • 193 Citations
  • 9 Publications
Publications
  • 2016
    Title Spinal Motion and Muscle Activity during Active Trunk Movements – Comparing Sheep and Humans Adopting Upright and Quadrupedal Postures
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0146362
    Type Journal Article
    Author Valentin S
    Journal PLOS ONE
    Link Publication
  • 2015
    Title Surface electromyography in animal biomechanics: A systematic review
    DOI 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.12.005
    Type Journal Article
    Author Valentin S
    Journal Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
    Pages 167-183
    Link Publication
  • 2015
    Title Inter-rater reliability of trunk muscle morphometric analysis
    DOI 10.3233/bmr-140552
    Type Journal Article
    Author Valentin S
    Journal Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
    Pages 181-190
    Link Publication
  • 2014
    Title Molecular biology approaches in bioadhesion research
    DOI 10.3762/bjnano.5.112
    Type Journal Article
    Author Rodrigues M
    Journal Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
    Pages 983-993
    Link Publication
  • 2014
    Title Comparative need for spinal stabilisation between quadrupedal and bipedal locomotion
    DOI 10.3920/cep150008
    Type Journal Article
    Author Valentin S
    Journal Comparative Exercise Physiology
    Pages 95-106
    Link Publication
  • 2014
    Title Age and side-related morphometric MRI evaluation of trunk muscles in people without back pain
    DOI 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.007
    Type Journal Article
    Author Valentin S
    Journal Manual Therapy
    Pages 90-95
    Link Publication
  • 2014
    Title Kinematic parameters of sheep walking on a treadmill
    DOI 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.09.028
    Type Journal Article
    Author Valentin S
    Journal The Veterinary Journal
    Pages 657-658
    Link Publication
  • 2015
    Title MRI-determined lumbar muscle morphometry in man and sheep: potential biomechanical implications for ovine model to human spine translation
    DOI 10.1111/joa.12354
    Type Journal Article
    Author Valentin S
    Journal Journal of Anatomy
    Pages 506-513
    Link Publication
  • 2015
    Title In vivo magnetic resonance imaging features of spinal muscles in the ovine model
    DOI 10.1016/j.jot.2015.09.004
    Type Journal Article
    Author Valentin S
    Journal Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
    Pages 1-9
    Link Publication

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • , external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • Acknowledgements
  • IFG-Form
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF