Unifying structural proof theory via bounded sequent calculi
Unifying structural proof theory via bounded sequent calculi
Disciplines
Philosophy, Ethics, Religion (100%)
Keywords
-
Structural Proof Theory,
Sequent Calculus,
Non-Classical Logics,
Cut-Elimination,
Hypersequent Calculus,
Subformula Property
A mathematical formalisation of a system of reasoning is called a logic. Logic plays a prominent role in numerous areas of computer science, mathematical logic, linguistics, philosophy and further afield. Aside from the diversity of these domains, the reasoning that applies in these scenarios is also distinctive. No single logic applies to all these scenarios. Several prominent questions arise when investigating a logic. For example: can we efficiently determine if a given statement (reasoning) is a consequence of the logic? What is the complexity of such an algorithm? How does the logic relate to other logics in the vicinity? Proof systems are useful to answer such questions. They are mathematical formalisms that can generate (in an abstract sense) the proofs of exactly those statements that are consequences of the logic. In 1935, Gerhard Gentzen introduced an elegant proof system called the "sequent calculus" for several prominent logics, where the proof system satisfied the "analyticity" property. Roughly speaking, analyticity asserts that a proof of a complex statement is composable from proofs of simpler statements, and through this, relates the complexity of a statement to the structure of its proof. Unfortunately, it is difficult or even impossible to construct a sequent calculus with the analyticity property for most logics of interest. For this reason, the state of the art has focussed on the development of intricate new proof systems---replacing the sequent calculus. There is a price to pay: despite satisfying analyticity, due to their intricacy, it is difficult to apply these proof systems to investigate logical questions. This project aims to investigate how the intricate proof systems with analyticity could be reduced to sequent calculi satisfying various properties that are weaker than analyticity (yet still useful). Such proof systems are called "bounded sequent calculi". This project will commence a research programme on the theory of bounded sequent calculi, and will use the bounded sequent calculi to study logical questions. Ultimately, we will investigate how bounded sequent calculi could serve as a unifying mathematical formalism for the construction of proof systems and the investigation of logics.
- Wolfgang Pauli Institut - 100%
- Agata Ciabattoni, Technische Universität Wien , national collaboration partner
- Björn Lellmann, Technische Universität Wien , national collaboration partner
- Jeremy Dawson, Australian National University - Australia
- Rajeev Prabhakar Gore, Australian National University - Australia
- Mauro Ferrari, Università degli Studi dell´Insubria - Italy
- Nikolaos Galatos, University of Denver - USA
Research Output
- 29 Citations
- 5 Publications
-
2024
Title On a Generalization of Heyting Algebras I DOI 10.1007/s11225-024-10110-8 Type Journal Article Author Akbar Tabatabai A Journal Studia Logica Pages 645-689 Link Publication -
2024
Title Finite Hilbert Systems for Weak Kleene Logics DOI 10.1007/s11225-023-10079-w Type Journal Article Author Greati V Journal Studia Logica Pages 1215-1241 Link Publication -
2022
Title A Finite Prefix for Analyzing Information Flow Among Transitions of a Free-Choice Net DOI 10.1109/access.2022.3165185 Type Journal Article Author Adobbati F Journal IEEE Access Pages 38483-38501 Link Publication -
2025
Title Analytic Calculi for Logics of Indicative Conditionals DOI 10.1007/978-3-032-06085-3_4 Type Book Chapter Author Greati V Publisher Springer Nature Pages 59-81 Link Publication -
2025
Title Tight length theorems for multiset extensions of Higman’s lemma DOI 10.1016/j.tcs.2025.115546 Type Journal Article Author Greati V Journal Theoretical Computer Science Pages 115546 Link Publication -
2021
Title Cut-Elimination for Provability Logic by Terminating Proof-Search: Formalised and Deconstructed Using Coq DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-86059-2_18 Type Book Chapter Author Goré R Publisher Springer Nature Pages 299-313 -
2021
Title Display to Labeled Proofs and Back Again for Tense Logics DOI 10.1145/3460492 Type Journal Article Author Ciabattoni A Journal ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL) Pages 1-31 Link Publication -
2021
Title Decidability and Complexity in Weakening and Contraction Hypersequent Substructural Logics DOI 10.1109/lics52264.2021.9470733 Type Conference Proceeding Abstract Author Balasubramanian A Pages 1-13 Link Publication -
2021
Title BOUNDED-ANALYTIC SEQUENT CALCULI AND EMBEDDINGS FOR HYPERSEQUENT LOGICS DOI 10.1017/jsl.2021.42 Type Journal Article Author Ciabattoni A Journal The Journal of Symbolic Logic Pages 635-668 Link Publication -
2025
Title Analytic Proofs for Tense Logic DOI 10.1007/978-3-032-06085-3_12 Type Book Chapter Author Ciabattoni A Publisher Springer Nature Pages 220-237 Link Publication -
2025
Title Universal proof theory: Semi-analytic rules and Craig interpolation DOI 10.1016/j.apal.2024.103509 Type Journal Article Author Tabatabai A Journal Annals of Pure and Applied Logic Pages 103509 -
2025
Title Universal proof theory: Feasible admissibility in intuitionistic modal logics DOI 10.1016/j.apal.2024.103526 Type Journal Article Author Tabatabai A Journal Annals of Pure and Applied Logic Pages 103526