Disciplines
Biology (30%); Philosophy, Ethics, Religion (70%)
Keywords
Moral Imagination,
Empathy,
Anthropomorphism,
Animal Ethics
Abstract
The project aims at an analysis of the relevance as well as the limits of imagination in
ethics. Animal ethics will serve as an important example of the investigations, but also
the perspective on and the treatment of humans, who do not conform to an alleged
average normality, (for instance, people with disability) play a pivotal role.
To date, many relevant theories in ethics generally and in animal ethics in particular
emphasise (supposedly) rational principles and methods when reflecting on moral
obligations. Yet such a procedure disregards that, in a responsible treatment of humans
and animals, imagination and empathy which always show an emotional component
play a crucial role. Moreover, it is relevant to be aware under which conditions and in
the face of which groups of living beings we reach the limits of understanding, empathy
and compassion. Is it always easily possible to empathise with a jellyfish, a bat or, for
instance, with a human person with autism and, consequently, do justice to them?
Drawing from relevant theories on empathy and intersubjectivity, this project will,
therefore, tackle the following questions:
1. What can imagination do? How is our imaginative power influenced by social and
cultural realities? To what extent can we learn or at least support imagination?
2. Empathy, i.e. the capacity to read and understand others emotions and
intentions, will be examined regarding the basic possibility to know something
about foreign mental states. Moreover, we will tackle the question how cultural
prerequisites co-determine what we can(not) understand and where the frontier
of empathy lies.
3. Are we always bound to a specifically human perspective? What would that mean
for our dealing with animals, wouldnt we find, thus, only the human in the
animal? If we tacitly proceed from a particular image of the human how does
this influence empathy with those humans, who do not conform to this image due
to impairment, illness or other forms of anormality?