Disciplines
Health Sciences (25%); Political Science (25%); Law (25%); Sociology (25%)
Keywords
Biopolitics,
Democracy,
Censorship,
Covid,
Liberal
Abstract
Starting in March 2020, the Covid crisis has resulted in widely shared practices of public shaming,
weaponization of moral virtue, and the dehumanization of those we disagree with. Even though
the existential aim of social sciences is debate and disagreement to further knowledge, a sudden
groupthink repurposed those as the expression of alleged alt-right extremism. This end of the
discussion has allowed the Covid measures to simultaneously wreak havoc on public health and
undermine the rule of law. This volume argues that grounded criticism must be urgently restored
within social sciences and public health, as the fate of democracy depends on the respect for
scientific discussion and on the ability of the academic world to be heard in political debates.
In order to do so, the volume delves into the way in which the normalization of fear and social
compliance has laid the groundwork before and during Covid for what some call digital
authoritarianism; it explores the collateral damage wrought by lockdowns and censorship as a
case study in biopolitical issues; it examines the instrumentalization of science and expertise
during the pandemic; it assesses the detrimental impact of Covid policies on our democratic
institutions; and it scrutinizes the response of liberals to Covid, probing the pandemic as a moral
and intellectual crisis for the liberal left.