Disciplines
Other Humanities (40%); History, Archaeology (10%); Media and Communication Sciences (10%); Linguistics and Literature (40%)
Keywords
German studies,
Media history,
Cultural studies,
Austrian History,
History of literature
Abstract
A river that flows majestically through this popular epiteton the Danube has assumed the
status of an imperial landscape. Although the epitheton has always been attributed to the
greatest river of Central Europe, in the 19th century it has become inflatory.
What was this majesty, the insignia of which could not been omitted even in the most objectiv
descriptions, based on? Although the Danube was the second greatest river of Europe, its
economic relevance was markedly inferior to that of the Elbe and the Rhine. Even his natural
beauty had to be stressed again and again when compaired with that of the Rhine. The Danube
was majestic not because it was a great river, but because as an element of nature it had to be
made suitable for human plans and norms. It were the amazing ambitions and goals connected
with it in the 19th century and the efforts that were necessary for accomplishing those goals
that made it gigantic.
It was the river regulation that has made this political discourse of the Danube particularly
important, because it made the river to an assignment of the state that had to regulate and
andminister it. However, the concept of the water highway Danube was connected with
strategic goals of the Habsburg Monarchy int Southeast Europe.
Proponents oft he Danube regulations preferred to call this a mission oft he Danube a
mission, to which it yet had to be made capable. It had to be converted into a highway, on
which goods and commodities could be transported in order to fulfill this mission.
An intensified trade and communication argued advocats of river regulation would bring
countries of the upper and the lower Danube closer to each other an would guarantee the
emerging of a great economic territory equipped with various resurces.
The monograf The Danube is the form tries to show how issues of the Danube regulation were
discussed in the Austrian and Hungarian public, how they contributed to the concept of a
Danube space and also by what kind of contradictions the concept was characterised. Through
the analyses of albums and of travelogues in English, German and Hungarian is being shown
how the aesthetic concept of the Danube as a whole was created in the 19th century.