Disciplines
Biology (50%); Psychology (50%)
Keywords
Pigeon,
Artificial Stimuli,
Visual Categorization,
Pattern Recognition,
Natural Stimuli
Abstract
The reasons why humans have the type of perception we do will never be completely discovered unless we also
understand other types of perception observed in nonhuman animals. Among birds, particularly the pigeon has been
shown to excel relative to humans in many of its visual capacities, which may have evolved in parallel with ours.
But whereas pigeons displayed surprising categorization abilities in many visual discrimination experiments, they
persistently failed on certain tasks, or only mastered them with great difficulty.
These tasks included the use of configural information, completion of partially occluded objects and
comprehension of abstract relations. However, if animals fail to master a specific task, it may not be a problem of
lacking ability, but researchers may just have failed to discover the appropriate experimental conditions. A common
attribute of most categorization tasks in which pigeons failed was the use of highly artificial stimulus materials, i.e.,
line drawings or abstract geometrical black-and-white figures. However, birds` visual worlds do not consist of
stimuli of that kind, nor do birds in their natural environment respond to such stimuli. Probably, naturalistic images
such as color photographs come closer to what pigeons encounter in their environment and what their visual
system is prepared to process. The present study will examine whether the use of natural instead of artificial stimuli
may be the key to success in visual categorization problems which have so far been considered extremely difficult
or even unsolvable for pigeons.