Neo-Latin in the Modern World
Disciplines
Linguistics and Literature (100%)
Keywords
- Neulatein,
- Digital Humanities
In early modern Europe (approx. 14001800), Latin was no longer anyones mother tongue, but it was learned by all educated people at school and functioned as the common language of Europe, similar to English today. The amount of preserved texts in Latin from this period is many times more extensive than that of antiquity and the Middle Ages and represented the most important literature in Europe. Today, the language and literature are collectively referred to as Neo-Latin. Although Neo-Latin studies are only a few decades old, they have already made considerable progress in this short time. Nevertheless, they still struggle with two major problems: First, the cultural and everyday embeddedness of Neo-Latin has not yet been sufficiently researched and there is a lack of understanding of its diverse functions. Second, most Neo-Latin texts remain inaccessible to scholars from other disciplines who do not know Latin themselves. As a result, the findings of Neo-Latin studies have so far had little interdisciplinary impact. This Special Research Area aims to solve these two problems. The first will be addressed by a research programme whose seven sub-projects will jointly examine the interactions between Neo-Latin and central aspects of early modern culture and everyday life. Each subproject is carried out by one of the applicants. The individual projects deal with the symbiotic relationship between Neo-Latin and Ancient Greek (William Barton), the oral use of Latin (Martin Korenjak), Neo-Latin among women (Johanna Luggin), Neo-Latin as a translation language (Federica Rossetti) and as a language of inclusion into Catholic culture (Patryk Ryczkowski), the emergence of different canones (Florian Schaffenrath), and the reception of Neo-Latin language and literature up to the present day (Stefan Tilg). They overlap and enrich each other and together make it clear how strongly Neo-Latin was embedded in the early modern period and how intensively it interacted with its many other aspects. The second problem is solved by a digital platform that includes a large text corpus, transcription and translation programmes, various tools for text analysis and a chatbot specialising in Neo-Latin topics. With the help of these tools, scholars working on the early modern period can for the first time independently evaluate Neo-Latin texts for their respective research questions. By opening up the enormous potential of Neo-Latin literature to other disciplines in this way, the SRA integrates Neo-Latin studies into early modern studies in general and enables a more comprehensive understanding of the era as a whole.
-
consortium member (01.01.2026 -)
-
consortium member (01.01.2026 -)
-
consortium member (01.01.2026 -)
-
consortium member (01.01.2026 -)
-
consortium member (01.01.2026 -)
-
consortium member (01.01.2026 -)
-
consortium member (01.01.2026 -)
-
consortium member (01.01.2026 -)
- Universität Innsbruck
- Günter Mühlberger, READ-COOP , national collaboration partner
- Nikola Dobric, Universität Klagenfurt , national collaboration partner
- Raf Van Rooy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - Belgium
- Lucie Claire - France
- François Ploton-Nicollet, ENS de Lyon - France
- Birgit Emich, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main - Germany
- Peter Burschel, Herzog August Bibliothek - Germany
- Colette Nativel, International Association for Neo-Latin Studies - Germany
- Pietro Daniel Omodeo, University Ca´ Foscari Venice - Italy
- Mintautas Ciurinskas, Institute of Lithuanian Literature and Folklore - Lithuania
- Ina Kazuro, Vilnius University - Lithuania
- Philipp Rölli - Switzerland
- Ingrid De Smet, University of Warwick
- Gesine Manuwald, University College London
- Sara Miglietti, University of London
- Stephen Harrison, University of Oxford
- Alex Tadel, University of Warwick
- Brenda Hosington, University of Warwick
- Teresa Grant, University of Warwick