Weave: Österreich - Belgien - Deutschland - Luxemburg - Polen - Schweiz - Slowenien - Tschechien
Disciplines
Philosophy, Ethics, Religion (100%)
Keywords
Indirect Communication,
Slurs,
Thick Terms,
Philosophy Of Language,
Semantics/Pragmatics Interface
Abstract
We are often explicit about what we think and want. Sometimes, however, we communicate only
indirectly: We speak in a roundabout way and rely on others to read between the lines. The ways
we speak indirectly are multifaceted, and the communicative intentions with which we do it are
varied. Often we communicate only indirectly since we intend to be polite or sensitive to the
feelings of others (It can be hard to reconcile work and private life vs You dont work enough).
But often we communicate only indirectly since we want to avoid accountability for what we have
communicated. Such cases of indirect communication are especially prevalent in political
discussions, where a politican may, e.g., want to cater to resentments of a particular group of voters
while at the same preserve plausible deniability (When Mexico sends its people, theyre not sending
their best. [] And some, I assume, are good people vs Most if not all Mexican immigrants are
highly problematic people. ). The research project investigates indirect communication more
closely. Research questions include the following: Which forms of indirect communication are
there? What are the functions of indirect communication (particularly in political discourse)? Are
there expressions whose function it is to communicate certain contents merely indirectly?
- Julia Zakkou, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf - Germany, international project partner