Disciplines
Philosophy, Ethics, Religion (100%)
Keywords
-
Neo-Kantianism,
History of political thought,
Hist
For a long time, liberal democracy was seen as a guarantor of social justicean idea that has been fundamentally challenged in recent years by the collapse of social-liberal democracy. Both political scientists and political economists have increasingly distanced themselves from the notion that liberal and social-liberal models provide a sufficient foundation for democracy and social justice. At the heart of current debates is the search for new political and economic models capable of ensuring the kind of social stability that was once expected from liberal approaches. This project focuses on the ideas of a largely forgotten tradition: the so-called left-Kantian tradition. This intellectual movement emerged in the 19th and early 20th centuries, a period when Marxist theories dominated academic discourse and Kant, after an era of Hegelian influence, experienced a resurgence in popularity. At the same time, this was also a period of imperial decline, when states were compelled not only to theorize about the idea of a social-democratic republic but also to put it into practice. Thinkers in the left-Kantian tradition understood democracy as a system in which norms must be designed to genuinely reflect the interests of all. Their approach was rooted in Kants concept of the impartial standpoint. Unlike theorists who adapted Kant for liberal models of justicewhere legitimacy is derived from procedural mechanisms or contractualist frameworksleft-Kantian thinkers maintained that our ideas of what is good and what makes us happy are shaped within the community and are therefore always vulnerable to ideological distortion. From this perspective, they developed Kantian concepts further, arguing that the realization of a socially just democracy depends above all on cultivating a culture that enables people to recognize what is truly in the public interest. The goal of this project is to bring these ideas into dialogue with contemporary thinkers and, if possible, to demonstrate that they still offer valuable insights into current political and philosophical challenges. I understand left-Kantianism as an experience-based position that, while closely aligned with aspects of contemporary Critical Theory, approaches the same questions from a perspective more closely related to modern social epistemology. By developing this approach, the project aims to show that its conception of social democracy (or left-communitarian republicanism) offers solutions to problems that analytical Marxism has struggled to resolve. Likewise, I argue that current neo-republican approaches are less capable of addressing issues of ideological distortion than left-communitarian republicanism.
- Martin Kusch, Universität Wien , national collaboration partner
- Violetta Waibel, Universität Wien , national collaboration partner
- Christian Damböck, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften , national collaboration partner
- Karin De Boer, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - Belgium
- Scott Edgar, Saint Mary`s University - Canada
- Nicholas Vrousalis, Erasmus University Rotterdam - Netherlands
- Katherina Kinzel - Netherlands
- Charlotte Baumann
- James Furner
Research Output
- 2 Citations
- 1 Publications
-
2025
Title Kant's Republican Account of Citizenship DOI 10.1111/rati.12441 Type Journal Article Author Widmer E Journal Ratio Pages 118-128 Link Publication