• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
      • Research Radar Archives 1974–1994
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Elly Tanaka
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • Impact Stories
      • Verena Gassner
      • Wolfgang Lechner
      • Birgit Mitter
      • Oliver Spadiut
      • Georg Winter
    • scilog Magazine
    • Austrian Science Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF ASTRA Awards
      • FWF START Awards
      • Award Ceremony
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership BE READY
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership BrainHealth
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • LUKE – Ukraine
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • WE&ME Award
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Korea
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol-South Tyrol-Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
      • Expiring Programs
        • Elise Richter and Elise Richter PEEK
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open-Access Policy
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • , external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

Analysis of runout prediction methods for debris flows

Analysis of runout prediction methods for debris flows

Dieter Rickenmann (ORCID: )
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/L180
  • Funding program Translational Research
  • Status ended
  • Start August 1, 2006
  • End May 31, 2010
  • Funding amount € 138,358

Disciplines

Construction Engineering (70%); Geosciences (30%)

Keywords

    Debris Flow, Torrent, Runout, Fan, Hazard Assessment

Abstract Final report

The term runout length of debris flows refers here to the depositional part or terminal flow path downstream of a defined point; for larger debris flows in the Alps deposition usually occurs on the fan. Although runout prediction of debris flows is essential for hazard assessment, no well established methods are available. The project aims at testing existing and developing new methods. The following methods will be considered for runout estimation: Empirical-statistical approaches refer to methods where the runout distance is typically related to morphometric parameters of the flow path and to the event volume. Analytical methods are those based on a simplified mechanical description of the flow behavior for which analytical solutions are available. Continuum-based mechanical simulation models for debris flows require numerical procedures to solve the differential equations. In the past, similar methods were proposed for the estimation of the runout distance of snow avalanches and landslides/rock falls. Some of these methods were used quite successfully for predicting runout of snow avalanches where sufficient data were available to develop or calibrate the methods. It is expected that similar methods can be developed for runout estimation of debris flows. The emphasis of the project is on larger events occurring in the Alpine region, i.e. debris flows with event magnitudes larger than about 5000 to 10`000 m3. As a basis for the project, existing information on past debris flow events in Austria will be compiled and supplemented by additional information. The newly developed methods for runout prediction of debris flows can be an important and useful tool supporting practical hazard assessment in torrent catchments.

Although debris-flow events occur less frequent related to similar natural hazards, these processes often endanger human living in Alpine regions. The disastrous effects of debris-flow events are based on the combination of precipitation events with the availability of transportable sediments. Beside the knowledge of the triggering of a debris flow and the basic disposition, it is therefore also important to estimate the potential runout of a debris flow, in terms of a debris-flow hazard analyses. In a first step, a database on historical torrential events in the Alps has been established. Within this database we compiled about 17 fluvial sediment transport events, 10 debris-flood events as well as 106 debris-flow events based on documentations from Austria, Switzerland and South-Tyrol (Italy). Based on the database, existing methods to classify different process types were applied and discussed. Additionally a new method was proposed to classify deposition patterns of debris-flow events. Further analysis of the compiled data confirm the semi-empirical approach to describe the mobility of a debris flow based on the relationship between observed deposition areas and deposition volumes. This analysis results in a new, quantitative method to describe a potential runout of debris-flow events on the fan. By empirical evidence of the compiled geomorphologic data, a correlation between the average fan slope and the average channel slope was found to calculate a dimensionless "mobility-coefficient". This coefficient can be used to estimate the potential runout of debris-flow events on the fan. For the practical application of the concept of the mobility coefficient, a new simulation tool, called TopRunDF, was developed. This program uses the semi-empirical area-volume relationship and is based on a D8-algorithm to estimate potential flow paths. TopRunDF further combines the single flow path algorithm (D8) with a Monte-Carlo technique to simulate lateral spreading depending on the fan topography. In a further step a one-dimensional analytical approach to estimate the runout of a debris flow on the fan was tested combined with a sensitivity study of the needed input parameter. Based on the results of this study, a second simulation tool (TopFlowDF) was developed to estimate the runout as well as the maximum velocity of a potential debris-flow event on the fan. Both simulation tools (TopRunDF, TopFlowDF) have been evaluated based on observed events and can be downloaded for free by www.debris-flow.at.

Research institution(s)
  • Universität für Bodenkultur Wien - 100%
International project participants
  • Perry Bartelt, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft (WSL) - Switzerland

Research Output

  • 83 Citations
  • 1 Publications
Publications
  • 2008
    Title The use of airborne LiDAR data for the analysis of debris flow events in Switzerland
    DOI 10.5194/nhess-8-1113-2008
    Type Journal Article
    Author Scheidl C
    Journal Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
    Pages 1113-1127
    Link Publication

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • , external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • Acknowledgements
  • IFG-Form
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF