• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
      • Research Radar Archives 1974–1994
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Elly Tanaka
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • Impact Stories
      • Verena Gassner
      • Wolfgang Lechner
      • Birgit Mitter
      • Oliver Spadiut
      • Georg Winter
    • scilog Magazine
    • Austrian Science Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF ASTRA Awards
      • FWF START Awards
      • Award Ceremony
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership BE READY
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership BrainHealth
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • LUKE – Ukraine
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • WE&ME Award
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Korea
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol–South Tyrol–Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
      • Expiring Programs
        • Elise Richter and Elise Richter PEEK
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open-Access Policy
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • , external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

Organizational Design of Novel Organizational Forms

Organizational Design of Novel Organizational Forms

Markus Georg Reitzig (ORCID: 0000-0002-8562-3754)
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/P26574
  • Funding program Principal Investigator Projects
  • Status ended
  • Start March 1, 2015
  • End February 29, 2020
  • Funding amount € 333,292
  • Project website

Disciplines

Economics (100%)

Keywords

    Organizational Design Theory, Entrepreneurship, Novel Forms Of Organizing, Empirical Research, Open Source Software

Abstract Final report

We propose to study if and where extant theories of organizational design require elaborations in order to explain the emergence and effectiveness of so-called new organizational forms such as open source software or new business models. Building on our own on-going work, we suggest that classic theories of organizational design among them the Carnegie School and its derivatives (e.g. contingency theory), while still capturing important features of even novel forms of organizing, may benefit from elaborations regarding three distinct sub-questions. These are as follows: First, how relevant are authority and hierarchy, traditional solutions to the design challenge of dividing labor and integrating effort, to new organizations? Second, under which conditions is self-selection, considered to be an important solution to the organizational design challenge in new forms of organizing, truly effective? Third, how do different solutions to the design challenges of task division, task allocation, rewards distribution, and information provision complement one another? We plan on pursuing the three distinct sub-questions of our broader research question by conducting five empirical studies. The first empirical study is intended to shed light on the first sub-question, and is meant to draw on archival data of OSS projects stored in the SourceForge Research Data Archive (SRDA). More specifically, we plan to examine if OSS projects are truly authority-less in the classic sense as has recently been argued, or not. The large-scale quantitative test appears feasible given clearly competing theoretical predictions. The second empirical study plans to examine the skill- matching hypothesis (see sub question 2), an assumption usually taken for granted, in more detail. Again, we suggest resorting to available SRDA data on OSS projects to create a large-scale empirical base for testing purposes. Given the relative ignorance on the mechanistic underpinnings pertaining to the emergence of self-selection, we propose to complement the second study with a third one. This latter investigation seeks to examine the antecedences of skill-matching in a more qualitative way through comparative case study analysis and ethnographic observation of new entrepreneurial ventures. In a fourth study we seek to shed light on sub-question 3 by studying observable complementarity patterns between organizational solutions for a set of published examples of new forms of organizing using Boolean qualitative comparative analysis. Again, and in order to delve deeper into the mechanistic underpinnings of these complementarities, we plan on complementing our fourth study with a fifth one in which we observe new entrepreneurial ventures over extended periods of time. The goal of this study is to uncover the micro-mechanistic factors that account for observable complementarities. We suggest that our research will contribute to a reconciliation of the emergence of novel empirical phenomena with extensions of extant theories that have proven powerful in the past.

To achieve more as a whole than just being the sum of its employees, organisations have to intelligently distribute the work load among its members, and merge contributions again later. Both designing different task packages and assigning tasks to personnel, as well as the remuneration of and communication between employees, and the solving of internal conflicts were traditionally planned and executed by management. For about 20 years, however, there has been a tendency towards so-called new organizational forms, in which authoritarian design and leadership are superseded by intelligent design and group decision-making. There can be many motives for deciding on one of these modern organisational forms - automation, motivation of employees, financial constraints, an overwhelmed traditional management - and many challenges and solutions. This project investigated the practicability and functionality of new organisational forms in three main studies. Depending on the research question, the methods used were: formal mathematical modelling (1), simulation (2), as well as ethnographic (3), a small number of case-based (4), larger sized archival (5) and, based in laboratories, experimental (6) empirical analyses. The analysis of 40 new organisational forms reveals that the design of stable new organisational forms usually falls under one of three archetypes: competitions, communes, and collectively lead teams. Novel developments can occur for single organisational dimensions - e.g. task segmentation and allocation; more often for many organisational dimensions simultaneously. Regarding the (de-)motivational effects of authority on employees we could establish different effects. Via random sampling of more than 600.000 of Wikipedia's article discussion pages it could be demonstrated that lateral authority, in contrast to traditional authority, is viewed by employees as quite motivating and helpful. Lateral authority, targetting the solving of specific problems, rather than holistic evaluation of employees, is perceived the more positive in the solving of organisational disputes, the bigger the conflict, the more competence the authority figure has, and the younger and more specialised the employees are. In a laboratory experiment with over 440 participants we further demonstrate that, searching for solutions for their company, employees' search behaviour is less risk-averse, and more open to less obvious alternatives, the stronger the procedural control of the superiors; even negative feedback has a more motivating effect than none at all. Increases in motivation achieved through workers' self-selection to tasks can further be improved through skilful project design, which will attract talented employees more. Thus, another study focused on a panel of 50.000 staff project-months on the platform GitHub shows that talented employees react more strongly to measures such as the inclusion of their input and fast feedback. Other results, e.g. regarding the effectiveness of new organisational forms or their lasting efficiency, can be found in the detailed report.

Research institution(s)
  • Universität Wien - 100%
International project participants
  • Oliver Alexy, Technische Universität München - Germany

Research Output

  • 224 Citations
  • 15 Publications
  • 17 Disseminations
Publications
  • 2023
    Title Managing exploration in organizations: The effect of superior monitoring on subordinate search behavior
    DOI 10.1002/smj.3491
    Type Journal Article
    Author Janjic R
    Journal Strategic Management Journal
  • 2017
    Title Surrendering control to gain advantage: Reconciling openness and the resource-based view of the firm
    DOI 10.1002/smj.2706
    Type Journal Article
    Author Alexy O
    Journal Strategic Management Journal
    Pages 1704-1727
    Link Publication
  • 0
    Title Open Innovation Communities as Complementary Assets
    Type Other
    Author Reitzig M
  • 0
    Title Managing Search in Organizations: The Effect of Authority on Individual Search Behavior
    Type Other
    Author Janjic R
  • 0
    Title What Makes the Right Contributor Tick? Treatments to Motivate High-Talent Developers in OSS Communities
    Type Other
    Author Reitzig M
  • 0
    Title What Makes the Right Contributor Tick? Treatments to Motivate High-Talent Developers in OSS Communities
    Type Other
    Author Reitzig M
  • 0
    Title Adaptation or Persistence? Emergence and Revision of Organization Designs in New Ventures
    Type Other
    Author Alexy O
  • 0
    Title Adaptation or Persistence? Emergence and Revision of Organization Designs in New Ventures
    Type Other
    Author Alexy O
  • 0
    Title Innovation in Organizing: A Descriptive Analysis
    Type Other
    Author Alexy O
  • 0
    Title Endogenous Status
    Type Other
    Author Reitzig M
  • 0
    Title Endogenous Status
    Type Other
    Author Reitzig M
  • 0
    Title Open Innovation Communities as Complementary Assets
    Type Other
    Author Reitzig M
  • 0
    Title Information Exchange in Hierarchies: Formal Analysis and Laboratory Experiment
    Type Other
    Author Klapper H.
  • 0
    Title Managing Search in Organizations: The Effect of Authority on Individual Search Behavior
    Type Other
    Author Janjic R
  • 2018
    Title On the effects of authority on peer motivation: Learning from Wikipedia
    DOI 10.1002/smj.2909
    Type Journal Article
    Author Klapper H
    Journal Strategic Management Journal
    Pages 2178-2203
    Link Publication
Disseminations
  • 2015
    Title Panelist Symposium (Academy of Management 2015)
    Type A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
  • 2019 Link
    Title Article (Der Spiegel, Dec 2019)
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link
  • 2016 Link
    Title Talk (TEDxFHKufstein, Aug 2016)
    Type A talk or presentation
    Link Link
  • 2015 Link
    Title Article (Der Standard, Dec 2015)
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link
  • 2017 Link
    Title Article (univie, Mar 2017)
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link
  • 2019 Link
    Title Article (Kronen Zeitung, May 2019)
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link
  • 2016 Link
    Title Workshop (Strategic Management Society)
    Type Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
    Link Link
  • 2016
    Title Professional Development Workshop (Academy of Management 2016)
    Type Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
  • 2019 Link
    Title Article (Handelsblatt, May 2019)
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link
  • 2015 Link
    Title Article (Der Standard, Dec 2015))
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link
  • 2019 Link
    Title Article (Der Standard, May 2019)
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link
  • 2018 Link
    Title Article (personal manager, Sep 2018)
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link
  • 2019 Link
    Title Article (uni:view, Mar 2019)
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link
  • 2015 Link
    Title Article (Salzburger Nachrichten, May 2015)
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link
  • 2015
    Title Professional Development Workshop (Academy of Management 2015)
    Type Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
  • 2016 Link
    Title Article (Der Standard, Apr 2016)
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link
  • 2016 Link
    Title Article (Der Standard, May 2016)
    Type A press release, press conference or response to a media enquiry/interview
    Link Link

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • , external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • Acknowledgements
  • IFG-Form
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF