• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
      • Research Radar Archives 1974–1994
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Elly Tanaka
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • Impact Stories
      • Verena Gassner
      • Wolfgang Lechner
      • Birgit Mitter
      • Oliver Spadiut
      • Georg Winter
    • scilog Magazine
    • Austrian Science Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF ASTRA Awards
      • FWF START Awards
      • Award Ceremony
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership BE READY
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership BrainHealth
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • LUKE – Ukraine
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • WE&ME Award
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Korea
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol-South Tyrol-Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
      • Expiring Programs
        • Elise Richter and Elise Richter PEEK
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open-Access Policy
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • , external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

Family and Women in ocialist Burgaria: Ideology and Practice

Family and Women in ocialist Burgaria: Ideology and Practice

Karl Kaser (ORCID: 0000-0002-9991-0295)
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/P14833
  • Funding program Principal Investigator Projects
  • Status ended
  • Start November 1, 2001
  • End July 31, 2005
  • Funding amount € 227,693
  • Project website

Disciplines

History, Archaeology (40%); Political Science (15%); Law (30%); Sociology (15%)

Keywords

    BULGARIA, WOMEN, SOCIALISM, INTERGENERATIONAL RELATIONS, FAMILY, DEMOGRAPHY

Abstract Final report

The proposed project aims to study the development of the family in Socialist Bulgaria (1944-1989). In particular, it will investigate the dialectical relationship between family ideology and policy on the one hand, and the social transformation of family forms on the other. An important aspect of this problem is the role of women, especially women`s liberation, in Communist ideology. The project`s methodological point of departure is the idea that Socialist systems such as the Bulgarian one cannot be satisfactorily described by referring to their allegedly "totalitarian" character. Such an approach falls short of considering the opportunities of "ordinary" people to change and manipulate the system. These, of course, depended on the level of repression, but in the case of Bulgaria existing research has proven the existence of a rather wide space for manipulative and accommodative strategies. The regime was forced to redress its policies accordingly - and sometimes even its ideological assumptions - in order to integrate changes emanating from independent action into the framework of the Socialist system. This basic assumption shall be proved here by analysing the Bulgarian Communists` attempt to create "Socialist families". This was one of the main projects in the realm of social policies, because Bulgarian Communist leaders felt that the traditionally patriarchal Bulgarian family and its specific distribution of authority and gender roles obstructed the attempt to create a Socialist society and culture. An essential part of this social engineering project was also the making of "Socialist women", as Communist theoreticians were convinced that all "progressive" changes in family forms were intrinsically linked with the promotion of women in all walks of life. The project aims at illustrating and analysing eminent changes in these ideological commitments and the respective political efforts which resulted from them. First of all, family ideology always contained contradictory elements, as illustrated by its ambiguous attitudes towards the emancipation of women. After the initial "progressive" phase, which saw both sexes endowed with the same rights and the family apparently radically transformed due to the processes of urbanisation, industrialisation and collectivisation, the Bulgarian Communists increasingly began to emphasise the reproductive role of families, and particularly of women. Women were supposed to be "worker- mothers". This development, which lasted until 1989, was mostly a response to the dramatic decline of the birthrate. But despite ideological and financial efforts, the demographic down-turn could not be reversed. Other theoreticians deplored the still marginal contribution of men to housework, and on a general level, a solution to the apparent problem of the coexistence of very modern and pre-modern elements in the family was sought. How could this be brought into accordance with what was supposed to be "Socialist culture"? The project will analyse these previously neglected problems with a wide range of methods. It will study social and demographic changes and trends as well as the development of Communist family ideology and policy, and interrelations between them. The project will be the first to investigate Bulgarian reproduction policies between 1944 and 1989. Particular emphasis will also be put on the perception of social change by "ordinary" people, especially women. In order to understand why people acted the way they did, and which responses they developed to the political intrusion on their private lives, it is necessary to examine their experiences and how their mental outlook was formed. This will be done with full consideration of the social and ethnic differences within Socialist Bulgarian society. Rural-urban differences as well as such among different age-cohorts will also be regarded. Thus the project will contribute to our understanding of life under Socialism in Bulgaria.

The project investigated relations between communist ideology on the family, socialist policies and social practice during socialist rule in Bulgaria. The family was an important object in the drive to create a "socialist way of life" launched after the Bulgarian communists took power in 1944. On the one hand, families were to be transformed into "socialist" ones and liberated from so-called "capitalist and bourgeois remnants". On the other, the Party charged families with fulfilling certain duties to the state that it considered natural functions of the family. The most important of these were communist education, and procreation. As a result, issues linked to the family, reproduction and youth were highly politicized and transformed into fields of constant negotiation between the Party-state and the population. The theoretical departure point of the project rejected the notion of the `totalitarian` nature of socialist societies. The project`s aim was to explore how Party assumptions and programmes shaped living circumstances in Bulgaria from `above`, and how the needs and values of citizens transformed policies from `below`. In Bulgaria, socialist rule enjoyed a high level of acceptance. All the same, the government was unable to exert full control over the population and was pushed to develop increasingly flexible strategies. The project did not assume "ideology" as a fixed set of ideas, but investigated how official discourse changed over time, from early ideas of radically remodelling the family to the integration of social practices "on the ground". Although the Bulgaria communists modelled family and youth policies closely on those of the Soviet Union, they adapted policies to the local context. Consequently, the study of the Bulgarian case aimed to broaden scholarly understandings of the heterogeneity of "actually existing" socialist systems. The project was successful in establishing the main trajectories of socialist discourse on the family, women and youth, and how these were translated into actual policies. Importantly, research showed that the political agenda of the socialist government was modified according to what it perceived as the principal current challenges. Regarding family policy, two trajectories were identified that co-existed but were of varying significance. The first was the emancipation of women, the democratization of family relations and the "socialist" remodelling of families. This agenda stood at the centre of government attention, as illustrated by progressive legislation and concerns about "pre-socialist remnants" in families in the 1940s and 50s. However, from the mid- 1960s, family policies increasingly focussed on the issue of reproduction, defining procreation as the primary function of families and women.

Research institution(s)
  • Universität Graz - 100%

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • , external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • Acknowledgements
  • IFG-Form
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF