• Skip to content (access key 1)
  • Skip to search (access key 7)
FWF — Austrian Science Fund
  • Go to overview page Discover

    • Research Radar
      • Research Radar Archives 1974–1994
      • Open API
    • Discoveries
      • Emmanuelle Charpentier
      • Adrian Constantin
      • Monika Henzinger
      • Ferenc Krausz
      • Wolfgang Lutz
      • Walter Pohl
      • Christa Schleper
      • Elly Tanaka
      • Anton Zeilinger
    • Impact Stories
      • Verena Gassner
      • Wolfgang Lechner
      • Birgit Mitter
      • Oliver Spadiut
      • Georg Winter
    • scilog Magazine
    • Austrian Science Awards
      • FWF Wittgenstein Awards
      • FWF ASTRA Awards
      • FWF START Awards
      • Award Ceremony
    • excellent=austria
      • Clusters of Excellence
      • Emerging Fields
    • In the Spotlight
      • 40 Years of Erwin Schrödinger Fellowships
      • Quantum Austria
    • Dialogs and Talks
      • think.beyond Summit
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
    • E-Book Library
  • Go to overview page Funding

    • Portfolio
      • excellent=austria
        • Clusters of Excellence
        • Emerging Fields
      • Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects
        • Principal Investigator Projects International
        • Clinical Research
        • 1000 Ideas
        • Arts-Based Research
        • FWF Wittgenstein Award
      • Careers
        • ESPRIT
        • FWF ASTRA Awards
        • Erwin Schrödinger
        • doc.funds
        • doc.funds.connect
      • Collaborations
        • Specialized Research Groups
        • Special Research Areas
        • Research Groups
        • International – Multilateral Initiatives
        • #ConnectingMinds
      • Communication
        • Top Citizen Science
        • Science Communication
        • Book Publications
        • Digital Publications
        • Open-Access Block Grant
      • Subject-Specific Funding
        • AI Mission Austria
        • Belmont Forum
        • ERA-NET HERA
        • ERA-NET NORFACE
        • ERA-NET QuantERA
        • Alternative Methods to Animal Testing
        • European Partnership BE READY
        • European Partnership Biodiversa+
        • European Partnership BrainHealth
        • European Partnership ERA4Health
        • European Partnership ERDERA
        • European Partnership EUPAHW
        • European Partnership FutureFoodS
        • European Partnership OHAMR
        • European Partnership PerMed
        • European Partnership Water4All
        • Gottfried and Vera Weiss Award
        • LUKE – Ukraine
        • netidee SCIENCE
        • Herzfelder Foundation Projects
        • Quantum Austria
        • Rückenwind Funding Bonus
        • WE&ME Award
        • Zero Emissions Award
      • International Collaborations
        • Belgium/Flanders
        • Germany
        • France
        • Italy/South Tyrol
        • Japan
        • Korea
        • Luxembourg
        • Poland
        • Switzerland
        • Slovenia
        • Taiwan
        • Tyrol-South Tyrol-Trentino
        • Czech Republic
        • Hungary
    • Step by Step
      • Find Funding
      • Submitting Your Application
      • International Peer Review
      • Funding Decisions
      • Carrying out Your Project
      • Closing Your Project
      • Further Information
        • Integrity and Ethics
        • Inclusion
        • Applying from Abroad
        • Personnel Costs
        • PROFI
        • Final Project Reports
        • Final Project Report Survey
    • FAQ
      • Project Phase PROFI
      • Project Phase Ad Personam
      • Expiring Programs
        • Elise Richter and Elise Richter PEEK
        • FWF START Awards
  • Go to overview page About Us

    • Mission Statement
    • FWF Video
    • Values
    • Facts and Figures
    • Annual Report
    • What We Do
      • Research Funding
        • Matching Funds Initiative
      • International Collaborations
      • Studies and Publications
      • Equal Opportunities and Diversity
        • Objectives and Principles
        • Measures
        • Creating Awareness of Bias in the Review Process
        • Terms and Definitions
        • Your Career in Cutting-Edge Research
      • Open Science
        • Open-Access Policy
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Book Publications
          • Open-Access Policy for Research Data
        • Research Data Management
        • Citizen Science
        • Open Science Infrastructures
        • Open Science Funding
      • Evaluations and Quality Assurance
      • Academic Integrity
      • Science Communication
      • Philanthropy
      • Sustainability
    • History
    • Legal Basis
    • Organization
      • Executive Bodies
        • Executive Board
        • Supervisory Board
        • Assembly of Delegates
        • Scientific Board
        • Juries
      • FWF Office
    • Jobs at FWF
  • Go to overview page News

    • News
    • Press
      • Logos
    • Calendar
      • Post an Event
      • FWF Informational Events
    • Job Openings
      • Enter Job Opening
    • Newsletter
  • Discovering
    what
    matters.

    FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
    • , external URL, opens in a new window
    • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
    • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
    • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window

    SCILOG

    • Scilog — The science magazine of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  • elane login, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Scilog external URL, opens in a new window
  • de Wechsle zu Deutsch

  

Completion of the critical edition of Albert of Saxony, Sophismata

Completion of the critical edition of Albert of Saxony, Sophismata

Harald Berger (ORCID: 0000-0001-8885-7620)
  • Grant DOI 10.55776/P28553
  • Funding program Principal Investigator Projects
  • Status ended
  • Start January 1, 2016
  • End June 30, 2017
  • Funding amount € 66,686
  • Project website

Disciplines

Philosophy, Ethics, Religion (100%)

Keywords

    Albert of Saxony, Sophismata, Critical Edition, Medieval Logical Treatise

Abstract Final report

1 Title Completion of the Critical Edition of Albert of Saxony, Sophismata. 2 Content The aim of the project is to complete the critical edition of a medieval logical treatise, namely, Albert of Saxonys Sophismata. This work presumably was written in 1360/62 at the University of Paris. The author deals with 255 sophisms, i.e., propositions whose truth or falsehood is difficult to determine, due to the ambiguous or complicated usage of logical constants. Apart from the edited Latin text, the edition will contain a critical apparatus, an apparatus of sources, an introduction to the edited book, and an introduction to the edition. 3 Hypothesis The Sophismata are a supplement to Alberts main logical work, the Logica. Writing the collection of sophisms, however, Albert seems to have felt obliged to alter several doctrines he had taught in the Logica. Such advancements or detours occurring in the development of Alberts doctrine are a main point of interest for the editor. 4 Method The method of the project is determined by the usual procedure of critically editing a text which has been transmitted by several text witnesses but of which no manuscript version exists that was written down or authorized by the author himself. A reference manuscript is chosen, its text transcribed and collated with the versions presented by other text witnesses, the remarkable variants are collected in the critical apparatus, and the sources used by the author are listed in an apparatus of their own. The introduction to the work will have to outline the logical doctrines contained in the Sophismata Alberti. In addition, Alberts other logical treatises as well as several works written by other authors will be scrutinized and compared with the Sophismata. 5 Peculiarity The apparatus of sources will shed light on the genesis of the work and its wealth of doctrines and, on the other hand, on certain discrepancies Albert did not manage to avoid.

The projects aim was to complete the critical edition of Albert of Saxonys Sophismata, a Latin scholastic logical treatise, written around 1360 at the University of Paris. The main part of the edition had been prepared in a foregoing project (P 24892-G15). In the Sophismata, the author presents and solves many logical and semantic problems arising from certain parts of propositions, such as from the word all in All apostles are twelve, or from the word not in You are not able to truly deny that you are not an ass. The treatise was famous enough to be edited in print five times at the end of the 15th and the beginning of the 16th century. These editions, however, present a very poor text full of mistakes and editorial interventions. So the history of late medieval logic, and especially of the sophismata genre, will gain some additional clarity from the critical edition of the Sophismata Alberti. This edition has now been completely prepared and is ready to be published.There are known to exist 28 manuscripts of the work (including fragments, even very small ones), 27 of which have been accessible to the editor. One manuscript was chosen as the best with regards to the number and severity of manifest errors; however, even this text had to be corrected in many ways, and it raised doubts whether it is closest in style to Alberts original work. In the apparatus criticus, the variants of four manuscripts are displayed almost from the beginning to the end of the whole text, while other testimonies are mentioned only occasionally, whenever it seems useful. There also is a second apparatus in which some of Alberts sources are identified and several hints to similar or thematically relevant passages in other works of his are given.

Research institution(s)
  • Universität Graz - 100%

Research Output

  • 3 Publications
Publications
  • 2015
    Title Zur Pariser Philosophie des Spätmittelalters und ihrer zeitgenössischen Rezeption
    DOI 10.1484/j.bpm.5.110809
    Type Journal Article
    Author Berger H
    Journal Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale
    Pages 265-325
  • 2017
    Title Text- und andere werkbezogene Revisionen
    DOI 10.1515/9783110495058-029
    Type Book Chapter
    Author Berger H
    Publisher De Gruyter
    Pages 325-336
  • 2017
    Title «Sortes differt ab omni homine». A Tension in Albert of Saxony’s Concept of Merely Confused Supposition
    DOI 10.1484/m.tema-eb.4.2017100
    Type Book Chapter
    Author Berger H
    Publisher Brepols Publishers NV
    Pages 283-302

Discovering
what
matters.

Newsletter

FWF-Newsletter Press-Newsletter Calendar-Newsletter Job-Newsletter scilog-Newsletter

Contact

Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Georg-Coch-Platz 2
(Entrance Wiesingerstraße 4)
1010 Vienna

office(at)fwf.ac.at
+43 1 505 67 40

General information

  • Job Openings
  • Jobs at FWF
  • Press
  • Philanthropy
  • scilog
  • FWF Office
  • Social Media Directory
  • LinkedIn, external URL, opens in a new window
  • , external URL, opens in a new window
  • Facebook, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Instagram, external URL, opens in a new window
  • YouTube, external URL, opens in a new window
  • Cookies
  • Whistleblowing/Complaints Management
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Data Protection
  • IFG-Form
  • Acknowledgements
  • Social Media Directory
  • © Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF
© Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfonds FWF